|
From the very
beginning of the Engagement Project, it has been clear that effective
academic advising is an essential part of a good liberal arts education.
It helps undergraduates develop a coherent academic career and draw
connections between their classes. Many faculty members sense, however,
that they are not as effective at advising as they wish they were,
perhaps through inexperience or lack of resources. The project is
encouraging colleges to offer training and resources for their faculty
advisors.
This workshop
was designed as a model for on-campus programs. Each college sent
faculty members and administrators responsible for advising, with
the idea that they might organize a similar workshop on their campuses.
The project will offer the colleges grants to support those programs.
The workshop
had almost forty participants from thirteen colleges. In his keynote
remarks, an associate dean shared personal stories of being both
an advisee and an advisor, and the benefits of good advising for
both education and life. A director of academic advising discussed
recent scholarship on advising practice, looking at advising as
teaching and learning, placing it directly within a college's liberal
arts mission. Another advising director asked participants to look
closely at their colleges' mission statements as resources for advising.
A panel of students discussed their experiences as advisees, including
the strengths and weaknesses of their faculty advisors. The participants
looked at three case studies, identifying the issues the cases presented
to academic advisors. A panel described the needs of students at
different points in the academic careers, and the corresponding
goals of academic advising for those stages. Finally, the participants
met as college teams to begin planning for discussions of academic
advising on their campuses.
Participants
went away from the workshop with ideas to strengthen their advising
work. They welcomed the focus on advising as teaching, an approach
sure to appeal to faculty members. They are also now aware of resources
for academic advising at other consortial colleges; on-campus activities
are likely to involve experts from sister institutions.
Workshop
schedule
Saturday,
February 18
8:30 Breakfast and mingling
While the workshop's main goal was developing faculty as academic
advisors, we also hoped to build connections among the participants.
This breakfast gave participants a chance to know their colleagues
9:00 Opening
session
Formal research and anecdotal experience tell us that good advising
is the key to a successful liberal arts education. But faculty often
feel unprepared to do effective advising. To begin our discussion
about preparing faculty, Bradley Bateman (Associate Dean
and Professor of Economics, Grinnell) talked about his own experiences
with students and faculty involving academic advising.
10:15 Break
10:30 Academic
advising as pedagogy
While larger institutions view advising as an administrative task,
liberal arts colleges are increasingly seeing it as teaching and
learning, an essential part of a student's academic experience.
Martha Hemwall (Dean of Student Academic Services, Lawrence)
discussed this development and its implications for faculty and
students.
12:00 Lunch
1:15 The
college's mission and expectations of advising
Academic advising should be rooted in the college's mission and
its understanding of the liberal arts. Participants brought copies
of their college's mission statements and--if available--statement
of advising philosophy. Joyce Stern (Associate Dean & Director
of Academic Advising, Grinnell) lead a comparison of these statements.
2:30 Student
views of academic advising
Academic advising is a two-way relationship--student engagement
is essential for effective advising. Julie Stockenberg (Director,
First-Year and Sophomore Studies and Advising, Colorado) chaired
a panel of Colorado College students reflecting on their experiences
with academic advising.
3:30 Break
4:00 Case
studies
This was a chance to think about some important questions involving
academic advising. Participants worked in groups of four or five,
discussing two case studies. Susan Minger (Director of Academic
Advising, Cornell) thenl lead a large group debriefing of the cases.
5:30 Break
6:00 Reception
and dinner
Sunday,
February 19
8:30 Breakfast and mingling
Participants continued yesterday's discussions over a cooked breakfast.
9:00 Breakouts:
Advising students at different stages of their careers
Advising students varies, depending on where they are in their academic
careers. Three experienced advisors opened this session by reflecting
on the issues involved in advising a particular cohort--first year
students, sophomores, and students in their majors. Here are questions
they considered:
- What issues
is this group dealing with? ·
- What needs
does this group have?
- What techniques
work with this group?
- What obstacles
does this group present to good advising?
After the panel,
workshop participants discussed these stages in greater depth. Participants
were randomly assigned into six small groups; each group was assigned
a leader. Here are questions they discussed:
- How do
students change over their academic careers?
- How should
advising change as students change?
- What do
faculty need to know to advise students at different stages in
their college careers?
10:15 Break
10:30 Campus
teams
This was a chance for teams from each campus to begin planning an
advising workshop for its faculty, based on ideas from this weekend's
workshop.
11:00 Conclusions
The entire group met together to share ideas about on-campus workshops
and discuss any final questions, chaired by Daniel Sack (Program
Officer, ACM).
|