ACM home
Info for faculty & staff at ACM colleges

Calendar of ACM events

ACM conferences & workshops

Visiting faculty positions on off-campus study programs

Faculty development opportunities

Faculty Career Enhancement Project (FaCE)

Committee on Minority Concerns

Committee on the Status of Women

National Institute for Technology and Liberal Education (NITLE)

Global Partners Project

 
     

Engaging Today's Students with the Liberal Arts

Beloit College

Strengths

We've had a fairly successful first year program since 1990, so tradition is on our side. We have a core of faculty who have had experience in the First Year Initiatives program (FYI), and are dedicated to it. The program offers a flexibility to the faculty to pursue a theme or topic which is interesting to them, and will be interesting to the students. If we see one of the goals of the program as using the material to generate learning of the components of a liberal education-critical thinking, communication, creativity in the broadest sense of the word, a sense of responsibility for effective action in the world, an ability to recreate yourself in changing times-then having things that interest the students will enable the infusion of those components. We have a lot of evidence that the program attracts creative and bright students to our college, and helps retain them. We ourselves believe that the program highlights and introduces core values of our educational mission, such as collaborative learning, multidisciplinary perspectives, and experiential education.

We are unique in that our program, from the very beginning, was a partnership between academic and student affairs. The partnership has made it possible for us to address the curricular as well as co-curricular needs of our students. This approach helps with the student's transition and integration into the academic and social environment at Beloit.

Another strength is the fact that our FYI program serves as the basis of our Sophomore Year program. Efforts to continue student integration are designed for the specific needs of sophomores, academically and developmentally. Both our FYI and Sophomore Year programs are regularly cited and copied by other institutions.

Weaknesses

Until recently, we've had some problems staffing the program smoothly, especially as it has grown in line with our policy of expanding the size of the student body. This problem seems fixed for now, though. There are three other weaknesses:

  1. Because our seminars lack many common elements, they sometimes seem almost too diverse. Students complain that they lack uniformity in terms of academic demand, and at times the diversity of the seminars causes some of them to evade certain common themes and common requirements. The tension between the two approaches-autonomy and common experience-is worth talking about.
  2. Although this is not a problem with the program per se, some of us think we have in the program an alpha but not an omega: we lack a capstone in the senior year which hones, in appropriately more sophisticated ways, our brand of education in terms, again, of collaborative learning, experiential learning and interdisciplinary points of view. This point might be worth making because even if a first year program is good, there is the question of what follows it. First year programs need the most thorough larger context within their institutions. At the moment Dave Burrows, Dean of the College and Vice President for Academic Affairs, is working with a group of faculty to address this issue.
  3. Another perceived weakness is the fact that not all seminar leaders fulfill the explicit goals and requirements of the program. For example, there is a requirement that all students participate in a service oriented/volunteer project during the seminar. This does not always happen and the discrepancy is noted by students. And despite the fact that our FYI and Sophomore Year Programs are unique and distinctive, the programs have not received the necessary allocation of resources or attention to keep us at the "cutting edge" of where we want/need to be.

Team Members

  • David Burrows, Dean of the College & VP for Academic Affairs
  • Diane Arnzen, Director of the Learning Support Services Center
  • Muyiwa Awoniyi, student
  • Elizabeth Brewer, Director of International Education
  • Audra Cooke, Assistant Dean of Students & Director of Student Activities
  • Joy de Leon, Assistant Director of the Learning Support Services Center
  • Bill Flanagan, VP for Student Affairs & Dean of Students (Liaison)
  • Margaret Govoni, student
  • Kathy Greene, Associate Professor & Chair of Education
  • Mark Klassen, Assistant Professor of Art & Art History
  • Diane Lichtenstein, Associate Dean of the College & Professor of English
  • Tom McBride, Professor of English & Co-Director of the FYI Program
  • Olga Ogurtsova, Adjunct Associate Professor of Modern Languages
  • Amy Sarno, Associate Professor of Theatre & Communications
  • Becca Zeni, student

 

Return to: College strengths

Return to: Engagement Project

       
       
 
updated 3/31/03