ACM home
Info for faculty & staff at ACM colleges

Calendar of ACM events

ACM conferences & workshops

Visiting faculty positions on off-campus study programs

Faculty development opportunities

Faculty Career Enhancement Project (FaCE)

Committee on Minority Concerns

Committee on the Status of Women

National Institute for Technology and Liberal Education (NITLE)

Global Partners Project

 
     

Engaging Today's Students with the Liberal Arts

Monmouth College

Best Practices

Monmouth College has a strong record of helping students acclimate to college. We make a special effort to shepherd them through a series of shared experiences, courses, and programs which give them a common academic and social ground.

Academically, their first year presents them with three required general education courses:

  • Freshman Seminar: This first-semester, interdisciplinary introduction to college is designed to allow students to stretch themselves intellectually via the establishment of a variety of study and academic survival skills. The curriculum, common to all sections, consists of core texts from across the disciplines but centered on a single theme, such as "Technology and the Human Condition." Students are asked to develop reading, writing, and research skills. They are also introduced to various Student Life resources, such as the Wackerle Career and Leadership Center.
  • English 110, Composition and Literature: This course asks students to write five or six sizeable essays as they develop their abilities to read and think critically. In addition to emphasizing the writing process, it also stresses understanding the symbolic and expressive uses of literature.
  • CATA 101, Fundamentals of Communication: The oral half of the writing/speaking requirements for first year students, Communication and Theater Arts 101 is a practice-oriented introduction to speaking in a number of forms and rhetorical situations.

To bolster first year success, the Dean of Students' Office offers both Summer and Fall Orientations; the latter is an intensive three-day program followed by on-going sessions during the semester (approximately one per week). Both orientations concentrate on three main areas:

  • Place: During the Summer and Fall Orientations, Monmouth's campus life is introduced and reinforced. This means addressing daily information such as housing, student services, and roommate conflict issues; it also means knowing where to go for what, including introductions to the financial aid, registrar, health services, and counseling services offices, as well as the Wackerle Center.
  • Purpose: The orientations also begin to instill in our students a sense of Monmouth College's particular liberal arts traditions. Included in these are introductions to our General Education Rubrics, presentations on the value of a liberal arts education, and programs on the history and traditions of the College. Amongst the most important of these traditions is our Matriculation Ceremony for the incoming class; as part of the ceremony, students read in unison a Matriculation Pledge and recess through a receiving line of the Faculty, who welcome each student to the College. By unifying their presence as a whole class while receiving them individually into the college community, we hope to emphasize our shared purpose-a fine liberal arts education-while also beginning the personal relationships which can help make this education meaningful to them.
  • People: Obviously, the Matriculation Ceremony is important, then, not only because it emphasizes purpose but also because it begins to build relationships with the people of the campus. The orientations also focus on ways in which such relationships can be made and maintained, whether between students with like academic or social goals or between professors, staff and students. The orientations are supplemented by strong faculty advising and college-wide initiatives such as "Mentoring Week," an opportunity for professors to meet with their advisees and discuss academic outlooks, formulate career plans, and gauge the students' general engagement with college. We take care to present students as many opportunities as possible to meet people with whom they might connect.

Challenges

Because Monmouth is in the midst of a complete curriculum review, we are already deep into discussions about what we might do better. In particular, we have four areas of concern:

  • We have made strides to integrate Student Life issues with Freshman Seminar in the past, but it has only been partially successful. One of the challenges we face, then, is how to engage an already-burdened professoriate so that it will address Student Life matters alongside the academic ones, particularly in Freshman Seminar. We have a proposal on the table, a one-credit course called Orientation for Success, but would be interested to hear how other campuses handle similar issues.
  • We need to work continually on suitable assessment methods for the goals that we have built into the new curriculum. Though these might be elaborate measures, they need not be. At one end of the assessment scale, we are participating in the National Survey of Student Engagement, which will provide us copious data on both our students and students from several similar liberal arts colleges. (Since this survey is also entering a phase of querying professors, we will be able to generate assessment data for faculty as well as students.) At the other end, as an example, if we have said that students ought to write better, there are course-embedded portfolio or exam diagnostics which could be employed to chart that improvement. In any case, we are interested in assuring both that our faculty and staff can monitor the intentionality and effectiveness of the curriculum and that our students can perceive intention and results when they come to the end of their fourth year here.
  • We need to strengthen the ways in which our students engage critical thinking, helping them build upon their knowledge year-to-year. A common subcategory of this topic is how we help students differentiate between opinions. This means that we need to offer more (and, again, more intentional) opportunities which allow them to think about how they value arguments, how they might sort out cognitively which position of several is most defensible. Right now we deliver such a course in the senior year with our menu of Issues and Ideas classes. The new curriculum may give our students contact with such a valuing process in both the sophomore and senior years, in particular, with the introduction of new rubrics of courses.
  • An on-going challenge for Monmouth College is the best way to recruit and retain stronger students. Through an Ideal Student Self-Study, we have proposed a number of methods to increase the quality of classroom participation, persistence, and success in our student body. This is obviously a matter of "engagement" in the first year and beyond as we search for the right admixture of students to initiate and continue our pursuit of a better liberal arts education.

Project for the Campus

Over the last three years, Monmouth College has undergone a major curriculum review, beginning with our core curriculum. Thus, our major project for the next several years will be to implement the new curriculum that we have been fashioning. This involves retooling "old" courses as well as the introduction of new ones. For instance, in the coming year, Freshman Seminar will be running three pilot programs under its aegis: one, begun this year, will generate a cohort of students who will take English 110 and Freshman Seminar with the same instructor in successive class hours, with some shared readings; another, also begun this year, involves three instructors teaching independent sections but significantly overlapping material, students, and presentations during the semester; the third will involve sections of Freshman Seminar being offered as named topical classes, shaping the course content to the professor's interests while still maintaining ties to the overall focus of Freshman Seminar itself.

Our goal is to make sure that students understand the purposes and goals of the curriculum as a whole; rather than just "taking the classes," they ought to have some notion of the intentionality of the curriculum as we have conceived it. This means clarifying outcomes as well as rubrics, a process that can only come with lots of conversation with colleagues both on campus and off.

Team Members

  • George Arnold, Dean of the College & VP for Academic Affairs
  • Rajkumar Ambrose, Associate Dean of the Faculty
  • Jacquelyn Condon, VP for Student Life & Dean of Students
  • Michael Connell, Chair & Associate Professor of Political Economy and Commerce
  • Patricia Draves, Associate Professor of Chemistry
  • Christopher Fassano, Associate Professor of Physics
  • Trudi Peterson, Assistant Professor of Communications
  • Mark Willhardt, Assistant Professor of English (Liaison)

 

Return to: College strengths

Return to: Engagement Project

       
       
 
updated 3/31/03