|
Strengths
The
First Year Studies (FYS) program began at Ripon College in the fall
of 1998. Since that time, all entering students with fewer than
12 hours of transfer credit have been required to pass a First Year
Studies course. Students select an individual course, which is linked
with one or two other courses (forming a cluster) on a common issue
with contemporary implications. Cluster topics have included immigration,
love, friends and family, the media, the prairie, war and peace.
Individual
faculty members within the cluster teach their own course. So unlike
traditional "team-taught" courses, the individual professor still
retains the ability to select appropriate content for their course,
decide the assignments for students, and determine students' grades.
The collaborative nature of the teaching occurs when the cluster
meets together. Approximately 25% of class time is devoted to these
interdisciplinary meetings of the cluster.
For
example, students in the FYS history course, "Love in the Western
World," read The Return of Martin Guerre, an interpretative work
by the historian Natalie Zemon Davis. The other two sections of
the cluster (one an FYS course in the fine arts and the other an
FYS course in literature) read the historical novel, The Wife of
Martin Guerre, by Janet Lewis. All the students in the cluster watch
the French film, The Return of Martin Guerre. The three sections
meet together to discuss the material, and divide into small groups
that cross the disciplinary lines. The students first have to teach
each other about what they read (but the others didn't), and then
discuss the sources together. The next day they give presentations
on their ideas to the entire cluster.
There
are many benefits derived from the collaborative nature of the FYS
program. For the faculty, teaching on a common theme with other
colleagues while staying in one's own discipline gives a comfort
level not afforded when all first year classes have to cover the
same topic. Faculty still feel "in charge" of their classes with
the way the FYS program is structured. Faculty get the benefits
of team-teaching a course: an exchange of ideas across the disciplines,
and a richer way of understanding a topic provided by sharing differing
methodologies. In addition, faculty get a sense of the interconnectedness
of the academic enterprise, and realize that their colleagues often
share similar interests.
By
consciously employing the methodologies of their disciplines, the
faculty also impart benefits to the students. Students see the differences
and similarities that the disciplines offer. They see the benefits
of using many methodologies to approach a problem. They also see
professors sharing ideas, challenging beliefs, and debating each
other. The professors model how scholars learn constructively from
each other even when holding different points of view.
A
final benefit for the students (and indeed for the whole cluster)
is the camaraderie that develops in these individual class sections.
Very early in the semester each section develops a self-conscious
identity because they have other classes against which to compare
themselves. Students in the history FYS course, for example, identify
themselves AS historians because they are conscious of the fact
that there are other students in the cluster who are using different
methodologies as they approach the same topic. When they get together
for discussions with the other sections, the history students will
frequently demand to know the historical context of the work the
other class is reading, or they will ask questions about the degree
to which the gender or class of the author affected the writing
of the text. By the end of the semester, the students in these FYS
clusters acquire a fundamental grasp of the interconnectedness of
the liberal arts.
Challenges
Ripon
College strives to provide a comprehensive student experience. Learning
is active in and out of the classroom. Results from the National
Survey of Student Engagement illustrate that our students are extremely
active with extracurricular involvements, and that active and collaborative
learning and student-faculty interactions are very much part of
the Ripon College experience.
Much
attention has been devoted to first year students in the past years
following goals listed in the College's comprehensive planning process.
A summer orientation program was implemented leading to a smoother
transition for both new students and their parents. Our First Year
Studies course was refined, leading to positive student reaction.
All first year students take the Noel Levitz College Student Inventory,
and then have their results interpreted with a Student Affairs staff
member. Career Development schedules an open house for all new students.
A well-received college reading experience was implemented this
past year. Direct relationships can be difficult to draw, but retention
statistics between the first and second year have been on the rise.
We
have entertained the idea of paying some additional attention to
the sophomore experience. There is potential for the transition
to sophomore year as well as the sophomore year itself. Statistics
clearly show that retention is most volatile in the first two years
of college. In assessing profiles of students who left the college,
we did see some relationship between undeclared majors and higher
numbers of withdrawals. As a result we attempted a workshop for
sophomores to address this issue. The attendance was minimal.
Our
Assistant Dean for Academic Affairs also designed a program where
all students on academic probation are assigned to a student service
staff mentor who works with them throughout the semester. Together
they discuss reasons for past difficulties and reflect upon performance
as the semester unfolds. On this approach there is little doubt
of the effectiveness, as the number of academic dismissals has dropped
and fewer students with poor grades are leaving Ripon College.
However,
there clearly is room for some more focus in the sophomore year.
Students begin to assume leadership positions in groups, choosing
a major becomes more necessary, consideration of off-campus programs
arises, students who didn't connect their first year may begin to
wonder if they will ever "fit," and career exploration becomes a
significant reality.
Potential
exists to make the sophomore year more special. Renewed reflection
on the liberal arts, additional interaction between students and
faculty/staff, attention to retention issues, a curricular initiative
similar in design to the First Year Studies course, and directed
career exploration may be a few areas to consider. The overall goal
would be to enhance the level of student engagement beyond the first
year. Efforts leading to increased student satisfaction and personal
growth enhancement would certainly be worthwhile.
Team
Members
-
Bill Schang, VP & Dean of Faculty
- Michele
Wittler, Registrar & Assistant Dean for Academic Affairs
- Soren
Hauge, Assistant Professor of Economics
- Diane
Mockridge, Professor of History & Coordinator, First Year Studies
Program (Liaison)
- Christopher
Ogle, VP & Dean of Students
- Dean
Pape, Assistant Professor of Communications
- Jessica
Spanbauer, Assistant Director in Student Support Services
- Peggy
Stevens, Professor & Chair of Biology
|