|
What
we do well at The University of Chicago
Our framework for general education provides a common ground that
allows all students to engage in intellectual discovery across disciplines
without regard to their potential concentrations (except in the
case of the sciences). All College students at the University of
Chicago are required to take fifteen general education courses in
the social sciences, humanities, biological sciences, and physical
sciences. To fulfill these requirements, students must choose from
a short list of specially designed introductory sequences that-although
enhancing the acquisition of skills-are not necessarily precursors
to a particular discipline, but rather introductions to the ways
that practitioners in those disciplines think and do their work.
Upper-class students asked to reflect on the value of the general
education requirements frequently express that-beyond gaining specific
critical analysis, quantitative, and communicative skills-by taking
these courses they are better prepared to participate fully as citizens
in a democratic society. They enjoy talking outside of classes about
common texts and concepts and working collaboratively in many areas
and they appreciate that the variety of offerings in each of the
general education sequences allows a certain amount of personal
choice.
Additionally,
we feel that our emphasis on engaging the student with the text
in the humanities and social sciences sequences, expecting them
to discuss and write about the text independently rather than relying
on established critical analysis, is one of our strengths. Through
small class discussions and writing tutorials, students learn to
trust their own opinions about the text, to articulate them verbally
and in writing, to defend them if necessary, and to hear the opposing
points of view.
What
could we do better?
At
Chicago we have seen a decrease in the number of students willing
to concentrate in the humanities even if that is where their hearts
would take them. Anxieties about future careers and paying back
loans dominate many discussions during advising conferences, and
pressure from home to do something practical (meaning pre-professional)
often results in declaring concentrations that students are not
particularly interested in or, in some case, well-suited for. We
would like to be able to improve our ability to articulate the values
of humanistic studies and thus increase the number of students who
are willing to risk taking humanities courses and concentrating
in the humanities.
A
project the College might pursue to address the challenge
We are interested in doing a study assessing the current state of
the humanities, looking at historical and current practices and
student perceptions, and making recommendations about how to better
promote and enhance participation in the humanities.
Team
Members
-
Thomas Christianson, Senior Lecturer, Biological Sciences Collegiate
Division
- Andrea
Gates, Adviser in the College & Chair of Four-Year Plan Committee
- Nancy
Gilpin, Adviser in the College
- Carrie
Goldin, Assistant Director, College Programming Office
- Devin
Pendas, Harper Fellow/Collegiate Assistant Professor in the Social
Sciences
- Jean
Treese, Associate Dean of Students (Liaison)
- Rebecca
Zorach, Collegiate Assistant Professor of Humanities
|