|
This
workshop in April 2008 will bring together Art History faculty members
from ACM colleges to discuss curricular and pedagogical issues in
teaching Art History. While Art History teachers are currently in
the midst of an exciting but disorienting pedagogical revolution
as a result of rapid advances in digital-image technology, we are
still reformulating our approaches to teaching in the wake of the
push to provide a more global and diverse curriculum. Through focused
discussions of the issues that art historians currently face, the
workshop will provide faculty members with the means to enact changes
in their pedagogy and curricula.
There
have been several recent MITC-sponsored conferences (Lake Forest
in 2002, DePauw in 2003 and Grinnell in 2005) that brought together
IIT, library faculty and staff and a few art historians from ACM
and GLC colleges to digital imagery and the issues surrounding digital
image collections. While these conferences were certainly fruitful,
the informal conversations about pedagogy and curriculum that took
place during the meetings made it apparent that ACM Art History
faculty members share many of the same concerns and that a formal
meeting to address them would be enormously productive.
|
|
This
workshop will create a community of art historians at ACM schools.
While we at St. Olaf and Carleton know each other, we know relatively
few of the art historians at other ACM schools. Through conversations
about pedagogy and curriculum, the workshop will form a network
of art historians both for the continued exchange of ideas as we
develop new courses and curricula in the future and for the exchange
of knowledge through guest lectures. We hope to re-address these
topics and any new topics that arise at a follow-up meeting in five
to seven years. We will also discuss the possibility of meeting
as a group at larger Art History meetings, such as the Midwest Art
History Association and the annual College Art Association conference.
|
|
For
each topic, there will be two or three 10-minute presentations by
conference participants on their specific thoughts and experiences
followed by a roundtable discussion.
The
role of Art History departments on ACM campuses
How
do ACM Art History faculty members understand their role as specialists
in the visual world as area specialists on their campuses? Are we
as art historians called upon as experts by our academic communities?
How do we see the Art History curriculum meeting the needs of the
larger campus community? Most ACM Art History programs also have
a joint departmental relationship with Studio programs; in some
departments the Studio program is larger and in others the Art History
program is larger or separate. What can be learned from these different
structures and experiences about how Art History courses service
Studio relative to Art History needs?
Designing
an Art History curriculum
At
most ACM colleges, departments consist of anywhere from one to three
art historians. How can a college with a small Art History department
support, encourage, or make at all viable the development of classes
featuring subject areas outside the specialization of its instructors?
How have faculty members approached the teaching of a course outside
of his or her "comfort zone"? How can digital media be of use in
this task? How might shared expertise among ACM faculty be put to
use in expanding expertise and curricular coverage at all the institutions?
Teaching
the Art History survey
Teaching
introductory survey courses is one of the biggest challenges most
professors at ACM colleges face. We would like to address the difficulties
of covering a huge time period and a diverse range of countries
and cultures in one course or a set of courses. How have faculty
members decided on what to include in a survey course? What are
the advantages of departing from the broad survey to a more focused,
topic-oriented introductory course? How has ready-access to digital
media changed survey courses?
|
|
Using
still and moving digital images
Due
to the ready availability of these new media, we would like to discuss
how the incorporation of digital images into our classrooms has
changed or could change our pedagogical approach. Some of us have
found, for example, that moving images are particularly helpful
in introducing students to architecture. This discussion will help
faculty members learn new ways to incorporate the digital world,
a world so familiar to many of our students, into their teaching.
Exams,
papers and assignments
Given
the more recent pedagogical emphasis on collaborative work and varied
learning styles, what kinds of exams and assignments have faculty
members devised that depart from traditional essay questions, stylistic
analyses of unknown images and research papers? How do art historians
integrate art collections, from small college-owned collections
to metropolitan museums like the Minneapolis Institute of Arts,
into their assignments?
Classroom
dynamics: lecture and discussion
How
do teachers provide a balance between lecture and discussion in
their classrooms? In this new pedagogical world where student participation
is key, how have faculty members departed from the traditional "art
in the dark" slide lecture? How have digital images changed approaches
to lecture and/or discussion? Finally, we would like to discuss
how teachers handle "hot-button" issues in their courses. For example,
how does one tackle religious subject matter without appearing to
be proselytizing, implying a familiarity (or need for familiarity)
with religious traditions on the part of your audience, or denying
the literal truth of various religious beliefs?
|
|
Friday, April 25
at Carleton College
5:00-6:00
pm: Welcome reception with wine and cheese in the Carleton Gallery;
conference registration
6:00-7:00
pm: Dinner
7:00
pm: Plenary lecture by Alison Kettering, William R. Kenan Professor
of Art History, Carleton College
Saturday,
April 26 at St. Olaf College, Dittmann Center for
Art and Dance
8:00-9:00
am: Continental Breakfast
9:00-10:30
am: Discussion 1: The role of Art History departments on ACM
campuses
10:30-11:00 am: Coffee Break
11:00 am-12:30 pm: Discussion 2: Designing an Art History
curriculum
12:30-1:30 pm: Lunch (Participants grouped by subfield)
|
|
Saturday
(continued)
1:30-3:00
pm: Discussion 3: Teaching the Art History survey
3:00-3:30
pm: Coffee Break
3:30-5:00
pm: Discussion 4: Using still and moving digital images
6:00
pm: Dinner at restaurant in Northfield
Sunday,
April 27 at St. Olaf College, Dittmann Center for
Art and Dance
8:00-9:00
am: Continental Breakfast
9:00-10:45
am: Discussion 5: The Classroom: exams, papers and discussions
10:45-11:15
am: Coffee Break
11:15
am-12:15 pm: Discussion 6: Future Plans: collaborations, items
for action
12:15-1:15
pm: Lunch in working groups to plan for future projects and
collaboration
|